Lin Guopeng,Ni Zhengwei.Least core: an efficient and stable participant contribution evaluation mechanism in federated learning[J].Telecommunications Science,2026,42(03):97-112.
Lin Guopeng,Ni Zhengwei.Least core: an efficient and stable participant contribution evaluation mechanism in federated learning[J].Telecommunications Science,2026,42(03):97-112. DOI: 10.11959/j.issn.1000-0801.2026011.
Least core: an efficient and stable participant contribution evaluation mechanism in federated learning
To address the “data silo” problem caused by data privacy protection
federated learning offers a technological framework that enables multiple parties to collaboratively train models without sharing raw data. However
to attract high-quality data owners and ensure the long-term stable operation of the system
a fair and reasonable value evaluation and revenue distribution mechanism is essential. Although the Shapley value has been widely used in federated learning for contribution evaluation
relying on a single approach limits the multi-perspective assessment of data contribution and value distribution. For this purpose
the Least core method was introduced
providing a new perspective for value allocation by minimizing the maximum deficit. However
the computational complexity of the Least core method
similar to that of the Shapley value
posed certain computational limitations. By further combining various sampling methods to approximate the allocation results
it significantly reduced the computational cost in large-scale scenarios while ensuring the accuracy of the allocation. Experimental results demonstrate that the mechanism ensures fairness and system stability while effectively improving computational efficiency
providing a feasible solution for diverse federated learning scenarios.
关键词
Keywords
references
Magalhes S T D . The European Union’s general data protection regulation (GDPR) [R ] . 2020 .
Glocker F . Der California consumer privacy act [R ] . 2022 .
Personal information protection law of the People’s Republic of China [J ] . Gazette of the Ministry of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China , 2021 ( 4 ): 28 – 36 .
Mcmahan H B , Moore E , Ramage D , et al . Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data [PP ] . arXiv ( 2016-02-17 )[ 2025-01-16 ] . arXiv: 1602.05629 .
Dayan I , Roth H R , Zhong A X , et al . Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 [J ] . Nature Medicine , 2021 , 27 ( 10 ): 1735 - 1743 .
Oualid A , Maleh Y , Moumoun L . Federated learning techniques applied to credit risk management: a systematic literature review [J ] . Edpacs , 2023 , 68 ( 1 ): 42 - 56 .
Kairouz P , McMahan H B , Avent B , et al . Advances and open problems in federated learning [C ] // Proceedings of the Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning . New York : ACM Press , 2021 : 1 - 210 .
Wang Y , Li G L , Li K Y . Survey on contribution evaluation for federated learning [J ] . Journal of Software , 2023 , 34 ( 3 ): 1168 - 1192 .
Kumar I E , Venkatasubramanian S , Scheidegger C , et al . Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measures [PP ] . arXiv ( 2020-02-25 )[ 2025-01-16 ] . arXiv: 2002.11097 .
Yan T , Procaccia A D . If you like shapley then you’ll love the core [J ] . Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2021 , 35 ( 6 ): 5751 - 5759 .
Liu Z L , Chen Y Y , Yu H , et al . GTG-shapley: efficient and accurate participant contribution evaluation in federated learning [J ] . ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology , 2022 , 13 ( 4 ): 1 - 21 .
Yang C Y , Liu J , Sun H , et al . WTDP-shapley: efficient and effective incentive mechanism in federated learning for intelligent safety inspection [J ] . IEEE Transactions on Big Data , 2024 , 10 ( 6 ): 1028 - 1037 .
Deng X T , Papadimitriou C H . On the complexity of cooperative solution concepts [J ] . Mathematics of Operations Research , 1994 , 19 ( 2 ): 257 - 266 .
Conitzer V , Sandholm T . Complexity of constructing solutions in the core based on synergies among coalitions [J ] . Artificial Intelligence , 2006 , 170 ( 6/7 ): 607 - 619 .
Bachrach Y , Rosenschein J S . Coalitional skill games [J ] . Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1 , 2008 : 1023 - 1030 .
Elkind E , Pasechnik D . Computing the nucleolus of weighted voting games [C ] // Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms . Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics , 2009 : 327 - 335 .
Balcan M F , Procaccia A D , Zick Y . Learning cooperative games [C ] // Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence . New York : ACM Press , 2015 : 475 - 481 .
Balkanski E , Syed U , Vassilvitskii S . Statistical cost sharing [PP ] . arXiv ( 2017-03-09 )[ 2025-01-17 ] . arXiv: 1703.03111 .
Yang M W , Jarin I , Buyukates B , et al . Maverick-aware shapley valuation for client selection in federated learning [PP ] . arXiv ( 2024-05-21 )[ 2025-01-16 ] . arXiv: 2405.12590 .
Chen K Y , Xu Z M . Federated learning for data market: shapley-UCB for seller selection and incentives [PP ] . arXiv ( 2024-10-10 )[ 2025-01-16 ] . arXiv: 2410.09107 .
Liu Y Q , Chang S , Liu Y , et al . FairFed: improving fairness and efficiency of contribution evaluation in federated learning via cooperative shapley value [C ] // Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2024 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications . Piscataway : IEEE Press , 2024 : 621 - 630 .
Wei S Y , Tong Y X , Zhou Z M , et al . Efficient data valuation approximation in federated learning: a sampling-based approach [PP ] . arXiv ( 2025-04-23 )[ 2025-05-10 ] . arXiv: 2504.16668 .
GEIMER A , FIZ B , STATE R . On the volatility of shapley-based contribution metrics in federated learning [PP ] . arXiv ( 2024-05-13 )[ 2025-01-16 ] . arXiv: 2405.08044 .